<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onpage or Offpage &#8211; Which is More Effective for SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog by James Harrison; San Diego SEO &#38; Link Building Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 01:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james_harrison</title>
		<link>http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-31517</link>
		<dc:creator>james_harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/#comment-31517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;They can&#039;t replace each other. &lt;/blockquote&gt;  
AGREED  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>They can&#039;t replace each other. </p></blockquote>
<p>AGREED  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-31413</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 07:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/#comment-31413</guid>
		<description>I think that arguing about which kind of SEO is more effective is useless - because on-page SEO is as significant as off-page SEO is. They can&#039;t replace each other. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that arguing about which kind of SEO is more effective is useless &#8211; because on-page SEO is as significant as off-page SEO is. They can&#39;t replace each other. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-30909</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/#comment-30909</guid>
		<description>It is obvious that both on-page and off-page optimization are equally significant for suceessful online promotion, but if a website is quite new it is better to start with on-page SEO and make its contents SEO-friendly.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is obvious that both on-page and off-page optimization are equally significant for suceessful online promotion, but if a website is quite new it is better to start with on-page SEO and make its contents SEO-friendly.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-30070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameseo.com/onpage-or-offpage-which-is-more-effective-for-seo/#comment-30070</guid>
		<description>Both are equally important in today&#039;s SEO market but if you have good on page then doing off page is easy as well as more effective in short on page can give the right direction to off page .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both are equally important in today&#8217;s SEO market but if you have good on page then doing off page is easy as well as more effective in short on page can give the right direction to off page .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

